I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
专家认为Xbox最好出路是脱离微软 独立自主发展
。关于这个话题，同城约会提供了深入分析
Play video, "陸劇《甄嬛傳》「馬拉松」如何成為台灣年輕人過年的「文化習俗」？", 節目全長 7,23
It’s two decimal digits long, it’s prime, it’s a palindrome and it’s the number of players in a football team.