This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用，更多细节参见safew官方版本下载
Овечкин продлил безголевую серию в составе Вашингтона09:40，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
def __init__(self, db_path: str):，更多细节参见WPS下载最新地址
No evidence has been presented that these safeguards are insufficient to continue to protect Android users as they have for the entire seventeen years of Android’s existence. If Google’s concern is genuinely about security rather than control, it should invest in improving these existing mechanisms rather than creating new bottlenecks and centralizing control.